The first of September 2016 marks the resumption of the previously-suspended tax audits being handled by the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR). This was by virtue of Revenue Memorandum Circular (RMC) No. 91-2016. The said RMC mentioned that the lifting of the suspension was done since “the conferred authority under the laws to the BIR for the collection of taxes, to be more effectively administered and implemented, requires some form of enforcement activities to ensure the collection of correct taxes at the times prescribed by the law.” RMC No. 91-2016 lifted the suspension of all field audit and operations of the BIR in relation to the examination and verification of the taxpayers’ books of accounts, records, and other transactions. Prior to this RMC, the BIR issued RMC No. 70-2016 which suspended the field audit of the BIR examiners (except in certain cases, like those cases already prescribing and those cases involving taxpayers retiring from business), as well as the issuance of written orders to audit or investigate the internal revenue tax liabilities of taxpayers. According to news reports, this previous suspension of BIR audits took place when the new BIR Commissioner was made aware of certain tax investigations that took years to be processed and were saddled with delays, some for causes that cannot be explained. Now, as the suspension of the BIR audits is lifted, the BIR is definitely back to the grind. But, what can the taxpayers expect? It could be expected that starting this month of September, several notices of tax audits will be issued to the taxpayers, and that the BIR examiners will be in full throttle again in their investigations. However, many taxpayers are anxious that there might still be cases of assessment harassment, wherein: BIR examiners may harass taxpayers by producing unsupported huge amounts of initial tax findings against the taxpayers, like what happened in the past. This situation is feared by many to be a possible source of corruption. Although based on recent news, while the audits are suspended for two months, the BIR is showing that it is serious in disciplining its examiners by releasing reports that there were investigations that are being made for allegedly erring examiners. Some have been suspended while others were already dismissed out of service. How this disciplinary approach will be sustained by the BIR is something that remains to be seen. Nonetheless, the taxpayers should be prepared for any BIR audit knowing that the BIR’s findings could be on factual issues and sometimes on a legal matters. Thus, taxpayers should be knowledgeable and updated on the developments about topics affecting their business operations. Also, they should always have a review mechanism to check whether the tax practices of their companies are in accordance with the tax rules. The taxpayers may also consider looking back to check whether there were errors committed in the past (for open years that could still be subjected to BIR audits), and determine whether amendments to the tax returns have to be made. Note that once the taxpayer receives a notice of audit from the BIR, the taxpayer can no longer amend its tax returns. As commonly observed, the usual findings of the BIR in assessments include unsupported expenses due to documentation deficiencies, unsupported creditable withholding taxes and input value-added taxes, withholding tax deficiencies, and differences from comparisons of amounts of identified accounts per books as against the corresponding amounts in the tax returns, among others. Hence, the taxpayers, in reviewing their practices and documentations, should not forget to verify these items. Note that simple hits and misses with regard to the tax impact of the companies’ practices could mean millions, billions even, of wasted funds for tax exposures. Thus, the taxpayers should be cautious about this. On another note, in case there are instances of harassment during assessments, the taxpayers should have to be firm in their values. Resorting to bribery would just encourage the practice of some erring examiners to continue, and will promote the system of corruption that we all abhor. Needless to say, bribery is a criminal offense punishable by imprisonment. The two-month suspension of BIR audits has already passed. It remains to be seen on how the BIR examiners will approach their resumed examinations, considering that the target revenue of the BIR for the taxable year 2016 is about P2 trillion. Will they be strict? Will they be reasonable? At any rate, nothing beats an honest and prepared taxpayer. Cheryl R. Gatdula is a senior of the Tax Advisory and Compliance division of Punongbayan & Araullo. P&A is a leading audit, tax, advisory and outsourcing services firm and is the Philippine member of Grant Thornton International Ltd.
Be updated on our latest insights
Our era is characterized by ever-changing technological advancement. Technology has touched our human existence including the way we educate ourselves, the way we deal and communicate, and the way we travel from one place to another. It has affected our interactions with one another such as shopping and socializing. From a business perspective, technology continues to play a vital role on how entities conduct their operation and maintain their competitive advantage.
This should be a good year for Goodyear Philippines as it has finally secured the confirmation of the Supreme Court (SC) on its 6-year-old refund case involving erroneously remitted tax on dividends amounting to about P14 million. The SC ruled that gains from the redemption of preferred shares are exempt from Philippine income tax if the provisions of the tax treaty between the Philippines and the US are complied with. The tax treaty with the US provides that gains derived by a US resident from the sale of shares in a Philippine company shall only be taxable in the US if the Philippine company’s assets do not consist principally of real property. The gains should not be treated as dividends.
Finally, after much debate and months of delay, the Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR) of Republic Act (RA) No. 10708, otherwise known as the Tax Incentives Management and Transparency Act (TIMTA), have been finalized and jointly issued by the Department of Finance (DoF) and Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) through Joint Administrative Order No. 1-2016. TIMTA aims to monitor and evaluate the fiscal incentives granted by investment promotion agencies (IPAs), such as the Philippine Economic Zone Authority (PEZA), Board of Investments (BoI) and others.
We have come to a time when we are no longer afraid of change. We welcome change, believing that such will be a catalyst for improvement. We are all very excited by blow-by-blow developments. We have seen it slowly happening within the ranks of the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) vis-à-vis the proposed amendments of the Tax Code.
There is a clamor to amend the rules in order to make tax rates more equitable. We have high hopes that the administration will see through the amendments to the Tax Code. It is important to note, however, that while the Tax Code amendments are hammered out, taxpayers have another opportunity to lower their annual income tax due, through the Personal Equity and Retirement Account (PERA) Act of 2008 (R.A.9505).
With appointment of the new Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) Commissioner, Atty. Cesar R. Dulay, everyone is expecting significant changes to happen in the BIR. Atty. Dulay is joining an organization cited by President Duterte as one of the most corrupt government agencies. Certainly, changing such an organization will be one gargantuan task. Stakeholders like the local and foreign business organizations, tax practitioners, individual taxpayers, and foreign investors are eagerly observing the changes that are being introduced. It is worthwhile to examine the BIR issuances released by the new Commissioner for the first two weeks after he assumed his post last July 1. These issuances give the stakeholders and observers a clear insight of the changes what we will expect and the priorities of this new administration
Discretion is a power which makes someone powerful even more powerful. Administrative bodies like the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) and the Bureau of Customs, were given discretionary powers in order to carry out their tasks to implement laws. The grant of discretion recognizes that the agency has the knowledge, experience and specialization on a particular field to make judgments. Discretionary powers facilitate efficient implementation, upholds the law, curbs the evils the laws seek to avoid and achieves the higher interest of the State, its citizens and those who sojourn its territory, equity. However, discretion is double-edged in that it impacts negatively when it is abused, performed in manifest partiality and favored one’s own interest.